pull down to refresh
Interesting, thanks for sharing, which one you think will get more traction? Any particular one that cached your attention?
reply
I haven't concerned myself with covenants much, but if I wanted to learn more, I'd start here and begin reading the rationales (linked to in the last column of the table).
reply
thanks, will do
reply
OP_CAT is an opcode that enables an inefficient form of covenant, and is described in BIP-347, but neither is itself a covenant.
There are many soft fork proposals, which add one or more additional opcodes in the interest of enabling covenants, that are under consideration right now.