> t's not clear what we can conclude from that, though. How does the state violating my rights confer on me a right to violate someone else's?

It doesn't confer any rights to you. You already have the right to self-defend.

> Our priority and focus should always be on solving problems by reducing rights violations, rather than introducing new ones.

I agree. We have to find the solutions to these problems. I do know of one good solution to the rights violations problem: ***get rid of the state!***

Rothbardian_fanatic

It's not clear what we can conclude from that, though. How does the state violating my rights confer on me a right to violate someone else's?

I think we just go further into error whenever we embrace rights violations, no matter how reasonable/necessary they seem.

Our priority and focus should always be on solving problems by reducing rights violations, rather than introducing new ones.

econ

The H-1B Controversy | The Libertarian Institute

Undisciplined

It's not clear what we can conclude from that, though. How does the state violating my rights confer on me a right to violate someone else's?

I think we just go further into error whenever we embrace rights violations, no matter how reasonable/necessary they seem.

Our priority and focus should always be on solving problems by reducing rights violations, rather than introducing new ones.