Bell_curve

I'm showing three scientific papers, one of them a systematic review, out of the many there are, which find evidence of the opposite. There isn't any slight scientific evidence that support the claim that refers the BBC news.

Are you claiming the opposite with those quotes/references?

ch0k1

But the intelligence agency cautioned it had "low confidence" in this determination.

As they should, since there isn't any scientific evidence about it, and a lot about its zoonotic.

A couple of scientific research papers among many in the literature:

news

Covid-19: CIA says lab leak most likely source of outbreak

> But the intelligence agency cautioned it had "low confidence" in this determination.

As they should, since there isn't any scientific evidence about it, and a lot about its zoonotic.

A couple of scientific research papers among many in the literature:

- There is currently no evidence that SARS-CoV-2 has a laboratory origin ([The origins of SARS-CoV-2: A critical review](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8373617/)).

- SARS-CoV-2 has a zoonotic origin, similar to the causative viruses of these previous outbreaks ([On the origin and evolution of SARS-CoV-2(https://www.nature.com/articles/s12276-021-00604-z)).

- The origin of the virus appears to be zoonotic ([SARS-CoV-2: basic concepts, origin and treatment advances](http://gacetamedicademexico.com/frame_eng.php?id=550)).