pull down to refresh
50 sats \ 6 replies \ @freetx 27 Jan \ parent \ on: could SN have dynamic territory fees based on engagement? meta
But potentially much greater profit. Most territories are probably already less than 50% net profit....maybe even far less.
Probably idea structure is:
- 10,000 territory establishment fee (to stop spamming new territories)
- 1-5,000 monthly maintenance fee
- 50% revenue share
I agree, but the point of the system is to create good territories, not profitable ones.
reply
how are we defining good? I define good as somewhere with active participation back and forth, and quality discussions (although subjective). by virtue of a territory being good, it would be profitable I think as a byproduct.
Do we have agood territory here that is also unprofitable?
reply
We're using it the same way.
Until a few months ago, all of the good territories were unprofitable, but now many of them are (at least on an accounting basis).
reply
interesting, is that becuase of the fee reduction and ability to pay in CCs?
reply
Two big things happened:
- The share of fees and zaps going to territories quadrupled
- Territory costs were cut in half
I don't know what, if any, impact cowboy credits are having.
reply
I created bitcoin_mining territory because mining needs its own territory and I am waiting for sub-territories, i.e. mining will be a sub under bitcoin territory
Definitely not doing it for the money or profits
This is the closest thing to community service in my life
reply