pull down to refresh

Missed a lot there!
Suppose two transactions are conducted. In the first transaction, one loaf of bread is exchanged for $2. In the second transaction, one gallon of milk is exchanged for $1. The price—or the rate of exchange—in the first transaction is $2 per one loaf of bread. The price in the second transaction is $1 per one gallon of milk. In order to calculate the average price, we must add these two ratios and divide them by two, however, it is conceptually meaningless to add $2/one loaf of bread to $1/one liter of milk. On this Rothbard wrote,
Thus, any concept of average price level involves adding or multiplying quantities of completely different units of goods, such as butter, hats, sugar, etc., and is therefore meaningless and illegitimate. Even pounds of sugar and pounds of butter cannot be added together, because they are two different goods and their valuation is completely different.
The CPI is a totally bogus measure of anything! If we were to be somewhat accurate about indexing to inflation, we would be indexing to the money supply and its rise. The way they do the CPI is just another way to rip off the people by the government. They especially like to rip of the weak, elderly and poor, the damn cowards. This is the Federal Reserve Bank at its very best. END THE FED FTS
I'm not as hard line about things like the CPI, at least in principle.
It's very useful to have measures like that. It's just important to keep in mind it's limitations and that you have to look at other measures too. The problem is people treating CPI like it's the Gospel Truth.
reply
Yes, if nobody says anything about it, then people will go on thinking it is the Gospel Truth. I think the best thing to do is to use Rothbard’s little description of comparing sugar to hats or butter or guns, for that matter.
reply