pull down to refresh
40 sats \ 14 replies \ @Undisciplined 29 Jan \ parent \ on: For next years fantasy football league Stacker_Sports
If there's a good way to add and subtract teams each season, I think we could start with 6.
I have ideas, but nothing solid yet. Effectively you could use 2 leagues. A redraft and a dynasty, the winner of the redraft gets to take over the team that lost the dynasty. I'm just concerned about how long it can realistically take to get a bad team good, but it forces the manager to make good trades and find good free agents.
I'm all for expanding the main league with the vision to move to a dynasty format once we've drummed up loads of interest.
You could also just run two redraft leagues and have a winner promoted to league 1 loser demoted to league 2 thing with redraft aswell... Really depends on what people really want.
reply
6 shouldn't be too hard to arrange. I don't want to give Pub too much work though. If we have a dynasty league I think it would have to be separate from the regular league.
reply
I enjoy doing them to be honest. I think I do have a threshold in which I'd begin looking at taking a cut of the buyins as "admin fees" but it wouldn't be much, kinda just beer money if I'd have to throw down several hours a week on admin.
Id look to get closer to 12-14 teams in play before thinking about converting to a dynasty format. And then if more teams want to join the dynasty that would be via promotion from a secondary league.
reply
Running contests, pools, leagues is work. I am not against a bit of an admin fee. I am also in favour of doing what I did in December this past year and giving you guys that are putting in a lot of effort running contests/pools/leagues a bit of a profit sharing bonus. Assuming the territory stays on track as reasonably profitable. Last year @Undisciplined got a big chunk of the bonus sats but since he is an equity partner now, he will receive monthly revenue sharing which should leave more sats for you guys at the end of the year.
@Undisciplined and I will discuss. I think it is reasonable to set aside some of the territory profit for reinvestment and for profit sharing for those making big contributions.
reply
That would be appreciated honestly. When fun becomes work it's no longer fun. Like I said, I enjoy it, but I do have a life I live and find myself very busy at times. A small recognition of effort is always greatly appreciated and makes it all worth it. Just people genuinely thankful for effort is good enough to me.
reply
Make sure it stays fun.
Since taking on territory ownership, I've had to adjust how I engage with SN a little bit, because it was starting to feel like work and I don't think I'm at my best in that mode.
reply
That's making me think about trying to implement something like a territory specific reward system.
Everyone knows how much I love rewards systems.
reply
I too love rewards systems. TBH, I might not be be here if the MSM did not fascinate me. Territory specific rewards are inevitable, a must for ~stacker_sports. The contests we run are also part of that reward system, aren't they? At least we're giving real Sats, unlike MM and FFF now giving away CCs.
reply
@grayruby started territories before there were territories and I followed his example.
I think we can also lead the way on territory rewards.
Yeah some days music is slow and that's cool, but other days it can be really rammed and I'll spend hours there listening and responding. There have been a few days where I'm just like... Nah.. I can't do it today there's too many you'll have to let that fall into tomorrow.
reply