pull down to refresh
40 sats \ 2 replies \ @south_korea_ln 30 Jan
Putting aside the question whether that's a good thing or not, i wonder from a practical point of view of things will look like. From what i remember, only entry and exit nodes need to care about the taproot asset part. In practice, will it only be these nodes that are involved with direct channels between them or will routing nodes be involved with increased routing opportunities/burden for them?
reply
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @megaptera 31 Jan
All nodes can route those payments. Except for the entry and exit node its a regular ln payment.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @south_korea_ln 31 Jan
Yes, I understand that.
Just wondering what the reality will be: only direct channels between people interested in taproot assets, or will there be a lot of hops involved involving routing nodes? Let's first see how quickly the wallet ecosystem builds on this tech. This will likely give us part of the picture.
Not an important question. Was just wondering.
reply
93 sats \ 1 reply \ @freetx 30 Jan
Thats great news for the 3rd world. Being able to just rollout plain "LN" and have both USDT and BTC available will help lots of people.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 31 Jan
No is not. We will never get rid of fiat.
Who is cheering for this crap is a fiat maxi not a bitcoiner.
reply
37 sats \ 0 replies \ @south_korea_ln 30 Jan
How far is RGB currently on this stablecoin on lightning roadmap?
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @Mumbo 31 Jan
Cool!
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @BlokchainB 31 Jan
Better BTC than on tron and Solana garbage
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @dingding541 30 Jan
@DarthCoin what's your thoughts on Tether on Lightning?
reply
15 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 31 Jan
The most idiotic thing ever.
This is how the fuckers are pushing people back to fiat.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nitter 30 Jan bot
https://xcancel.com/lightning/status/1885083485678805424
reply