pull down to refresh

As for positives I feel it could increase the amount of money spent on development of Bitcoin and Lightning as well as (hopefully) make Lightning routing profitable.
We see how centralizing it is on other chains when mining/validating/even hosting a copy of the blockchain CAN only be done by few actors due to resources necessary or IS only done by a few actors because there is no incentive.
I would love (eventually) a non-custodial wallet that holds Bitcoin, Lightning Bitcoin, and USD, with all channel opening closing and liquidity management to be done automatically. It would be huge for developing nations to be able to put what they need for the week to eat in USD and put the rest in Bitcoin, as one needs a guarantee of not starving due to Bitcoin's volatility.
Or how about and automated redemption and exchange like Strike. If you want Bitcoin your wallet automatically converts usd deposits to BTC and if you want to spend it convert the correct amount of BTC/LN value to usd if that is what the other party wants to be paid in. So you store in BTC and spend in whatever is the optimal output to the receiver.
reply