It is not xenophobia!! It is the common dislike of invaders pillaging, raping and killing on their way through the country. All people everywhere dislike invasions and will resist them. We are resisting this “Great Replacement Invasion” as best we can. **Deport them all!!!**
BTW, if you are Thai, how would you like the Chinese sending millions of people across your boarders to invade your economy and try to take over your country. Whether they are armed or not, invasion is invasion.

you don't share the xenophobia of 1866?

What I love most about 1866 is no one used electricity or petrol.  I admire their green initiatives.


>xenophobia

Its wrong to assert that anyone who is against flooding the country with foreigners and changing the language, culture, and political philosophy is suffering from a *phobia* (ie. an irrational fear).

Its a well grounded concern. A nation is its people. Its not an abstraction. Why don't we forcibly insist that Thailand meet diversity quotas? Why don't we forcibly change the religion, food, and language as well? 

I'm willing to bet you would be against that if America forced that change on Thailand?Why are you for it when foreign countries force that change on America?


Scroogey

Media Matters?!? I guess that the newspaper you read this from may have a biased POV towards letting everyone and his brother come into the country. The other side of it argued against rather strongly, too. However, the restriction still got into Howards’ amendment, didn’t it? Even after it was voted on in both the House and Senate and 3/4

 of the states. If it made it through that process, would you suppose it meant exactly what it said it meant?

Politics_And_Law

Immigration Laws the U.S. Should Emulate

Rothbardian_fanatic

Media Matters?!? I guess that the newspaper you read this from may have a biased POV towards letting everyone and his brother come into the country. The other side of it argued against rather strongly, too. However, the restriction still got into Howards’ amendment, didn’t it? Even after it was voted on in both the House and Senate and 3/4<sup>ths</sup> of the states. If it made it through that process, would you suppose it meant exactly what it said it meant?