pull down to refresh

Media Matters?!? I guess that the newspaper you read this from may have a biased POV towards letting everyone and his brother come into the country. The other side of it argued against rather strongly, too. However, the restriction still got into Howards’ amendment, didn’t it? Even after it was voted on in both the House and Senate and 3/4ths of the states. If it made it through that process, would you suppose it meant exactly what it said it meant?
I just don't share the xenophobia.
reply
It is not xenophobia!! It is the common dislike of invaders pillaging, raping and killing on their way through the country. All people everywhere dislike invasions and will resist them. We are resisting this “Great Replacement Invasion” as best we can. Deport them all!!! BTW, if you are Thai, how would you like the Chinese sending millions of people across your boarders to invade your economy and try to take over your country. Whether they are armed or not, invasion is invasion.
reply
reply
<sarcasm>Yes, let us have every person in the world come here if they want. We can stuff them all into a small section of Texas with enough living space. Getting rid of them would be much easier, too, wouldn’t it? Just a small bit of carpet bombing to wipe out 95% of the world’s population in a short time. It wouldn’t even cost THEM very much. Leave the rest of the world as THEIR parkland. Remember now, all native peoples can be replaced upon their ancestral homelands at the whims of the ELite. No matter what any old treaties and conventions say. THEY are psychopaths and THEY are proud of it and deserve the world to THEMSELVES!!</sarcasm>
reply
Another reason to oppose immigration: welfare recipients
reply
Naah, it’s not welfare if the NGOs are giving it to them, is it? Even if the NGOs are getting most of their money from the CIA USAID. I would like to see Trump do to the CIA what JFK said he wanted to do to it, blast it into flinders and let them blow away in the breeze.
reply
xenophobia
Its wrong to assert that anyone who is against flooding the country with foreigners and changing the language, culture, and political philosophy is suffering from a phobia (ie. an irrational fear).
Its a well grounded concern. A nation is its people. Its not an abstraction. Why don't we forcibly insist that Thailand meet diversity quotas? Why don't we forcibly change the religion, food, and language as well?
I'm willing to bet you would be against that if America forced that change on Thailand?Why are you for it when foreign countries force that change on America?
reply
you don't share the xenophobia of 1866?
What I love most about 1866 is no one used electricity or petrol. I admire their green initiatives.
reply
What is the xenophobia of 1866?
reply
senate debate in 1866
reply
Which senate debate?
reply
I say xenophobia sarcastically
I hate it when people go to the xenophobia well early and often
reply
Ok, there I noticed that only one side of the debate was being reported on, the progressive/lefty/Marxist/socialist/communist/murderer side. Citing that kind of reference is self-defeating when there is other information available.
reply