No good, the test invariably becomes a feedback loop.

A ballot for everyone with a pulse (in many states even that is optional) doesn't work either though, that just creates harvesting ballots.

Landowner-male voting as a form of stakeholder voting wouldn't be consistent in modern society either, but there's a case to be made for a modernized equivalent: Head of household voting.

Much like tax reporting where you're a dependent or have dependents, and said household gets one bill or credit, the household decides the responsible party for voting. There's organically a leader in each household, if the family recognizes them so to should the state. This is how minors get counted for well, 2 parents 2 kids = household 4 votes.

The left could never be against votes for minors and multiplying the votes of single mothers, right?