Top Posts
- Are Bitcoin devs the new farmers?
- Of regrets
- 12.3k sats \ 22 comments \ @cointastical \ ~bitcoin \
February 6, 2023
- 12.3k sats \ 22 comments \ @cointastical \ ~bitcoin \
- Ask SN: What's the easiest way to sell something via LN?
Top Stackers
- stacker is in hiding for
February 6, 2024
- @k00b
- 1491 stacked \ 3001 spent \ 1 post \ 6 comments \
February 6, 2023
- 1491 stacked \ 3001 spent \ 1 post \ 6 comments \
- @phaedrus
- 11 stacked \ 732 spent \ 0 posts \ 2 comments \
February 6, 2022
- 11 stacked \ 732 spent \ 0 posts \ 2 comments \
Top Comments
- #415567 on Introducing Citrea: Bitcoin’s First ZK Rollup
- 3759 sats \ 2 replies \ @lightcoin \
February 6, 2024
Assuming the details in the post and docs accurately describe what the final product will look like, the main difference is that Citrea is verified optimistically using a BitVM program rather than an onchain smart contract, and as such is limited to at-best a 1-of-n security model (wheren
is a permissioned group of arbitrary size) rather than a single honest party security model (as in optimistic rollups, where the single honest party could be anyone, and it is assumed that they can get a fault proof transaction confirmed during a challenge period) or a trustless security model (as in validity rollups, where all rollup txs are cryptographically verified). That said, the developers of almost all rollups on other chains have chosen to ultimately rely on some kind of multisig for security, because their smart contracts can be upgraded to any arbitrary new code using a multisig (often a "committee" of trusted community members, often with no time delay). So assuming this rollup does not choose to insert some trusted multisig into the governance model, that could also be a difference. [...]
- 3759 sats \ 2 replies \ @lightcoin \
- #132094 on Meme Monday - Best Bitcoin Meme Gets 10,000 Sats
- 10.4k sats \ 0 replies \ @Ed_Relight \
February 6, 2023
[...]
- 10.4k sats \ 0 replies \ @Ed_Relight \
- #10588 on Ask SN: What's the easiest way to sell something via LN?
- 121 sats \ 4 replies \ @kr \
February 6, 2022
the fact that there are 5 comments with 5 different answers tells me the winning solution here probably doesn't yet exist. [...]
- 121 sats \ 4 replies \ @kr \