This article on this topic is very interesting, even though private property no longer exists and anyone can vote anywhere in the world or, for the most part, in what the state calls democracy, it is surprising how no one talks about or is interested in these issues anymore.

Msd0457890

Politics_And_Law

By Ryan McMaken
> For both Locke and Montesquieu, private property was more fundamental than any political “right,” and this required prudential limitations on who could vote.