Scott’s technocracy was to be an even more radical social revolution as money was to be abolished absolutely and permanently. His society was to be one based solely on the power of technology and science, whose “will” was to be exercised by “experts.” The general populace would live their lives in fulfillment, in honest energy-spending labor, and in material abundance. His was a world calculated, planned, free of capitalistic spontaneity; a society, run by a soviet of professionals and engineers, who would engineer a perfect world, infinitely superior to the world created “organically” by selfish, profit-motivated, free individuals.
Conclusion
The Technocracy Movement was founded by two men obsessed with monitoring, with recording statistics, calculation, and planning. Scott and Hubbert are utopians that wanted to make the world better. The goal was a “perfect” world, but in their “perfect” world there was no space for freedom, individuality, or the opportunity to develop a unique self. For utopia, freedom must be eliminated and all choices are made by “experts.” What kind of utopia is that?
Gosh!! Doesn’t this sound somewhat familiar? To me this looks a lot like what the WEF and the motherWEFers are trying to impose on the world’s population!! The same ol’ bullisht, the experts will guide and rule everything in your life for the benefit of society. Unfortunately, none of them have read Mises’ Socialism, a book that refutes the idea that central planners can ever manage an economy without alienating a greater portion of the population and making everyone miserable and poor. The evidence of this theory being correct is everywhere to be seen; state interference in the economy generates poverty, everywhere and whenever it happens. FTS