pull down to refresh

The UN did not predict "unprecedented droughts" and they did not predict "an uptick in wildfires, hurricanes, and floods". The UN's hypothesis was that nations would be "wiped off of the face of the earth".
Why didn't you mention the benefits of a warmer planet? If you can't defend the UN's falsified hypothesis, then you should at least steelman how humanity gains from a warmer climate.
42 sats \ 6 replies \ @Murch 22 Feb
It seems silly to me to reject the scientific consensus on basis of a cherry-picked sensationally phrased prediction in a newspaper article from 36 years ago not having come to pass. If you read the rest of the article, you see the desertification and droughts right there mentioned next to it.
reply
If you read the rest of the article, you see the desertification and droughts right there mentioned next to it.
Yes, I read the part of the article where the UN's claimed there would be "dust bowl like conditions", which was falsified as well. My point remains untouched: Why didn't you mention the benefits of a warmer planet? If you can't defend the UN's falsified hypothesis, then you should at least steelman how humanity gains from a warmer climate.
reply
Because you made that claim, so it is on you to establish evidence for that argument.
reply
You said the UN's science is "directionally correct", how would you know if you didn't even look in the other direction? Clearly, the UN's predictions about global warming was proven false, so it's worth looking into the ACTUAL results that came from performing the scientific method.
reply
Temperatures have been rising as predicted. Desertification has been progressing as predicted. Ocean levels have been rising as predicted. More people have been dying due to extreme heat events. Storms, hurricanes, droughts, floods, extreme weather swings, and wildfires have been increasing as predicted.
You claim that the increase in temperature is beneficial. You have not provided an argument or piece of evidence in what way that might be the case. You're making the extraordinary claim, it's on you to substantiate it.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Murch 23 Feb
To make this more constructive: what's your precise claim? That there are also some benefits of that the benefits outweigh the detrimental effects? If the latter, that the benefits globally outweigh the downsides or that this is the case for a specific region?
deleted by author