I imagine that there are a large amount of papers like that, but given the state of The Science<sup>TM</sup>, vis-a-vis who’s paying for the results and the amount of peer-to-peer disrepute, I have troubles with the papers. Do they make any conflict of interest declarations? Is it state sponsored? 
I too, think the sun is the reason for the temperatures rising, but, f*cking around with the weather is no way for these mad scientists to proceed. Haven’t they ever heard of the *Cautionary Principle*?

Rothbardian_fanatic

AskSN

Are humans responsible for climate change? To what degree?

Aardvark

so, I agree with you.

however just yesterday i read a paper suggesting the thing about volcanoes dumping more CO2 than humans is wrong by a factor of 100. granted, that's not a claim about the rest of the gasses and dust coming from them 

I don't think it's GHG warming the planet, I think it's the sun, and theres nothing we can do about it. And I don't think a warming planet is such a bad thing.

I would like to curtail pollution, deforestation, and environmental negligence. I think the way to do that is going to be multi-faceted... and I think we should start by ending the banks ;) 