pull down to refresh
Converting more Saylorcoiners to Bitcoiners by catching the engagement wave.
Maybe. If so, he probably should have used fewer words and not mentioned Synonym.
I haven't read it yet tbh so maybe it should be:
Converting more Saylorcoiners toBitcoinerssynonymers by catching the engagement wave.
😂😂😂😂
It was only one mention, and hey, more power to him, but I think it exposes the message to criticism by muddying it.
John Carvalho is ultimately a builder, so I think he is pushing for move development focus.
Calling for support of alternate implementations is interesting.
The goal, as with most of my tweets, is to share ideas and info I think would be useful to people. I am generally a pretty sincere person, so it is okay to take my posts at face value, as long as you are capable of considering nuance and thinking for yourself.
I highly enjoyed your episode with Voskuil on Bitcoin Takeover. Great stuff!
You can really hear @BitcoinErrorLog channeling Voskuil here.
I'm a little skeptical of what he's trying to do here. Saylor obviously doesn't care about the real value proposition of bitcoin (anymore than people like Lummis or Trump). So what is the goal of a public letter to Saylor?