The self-styled “Medical Freedom Movement” is turning its guns on yet another of its heroes, HHS Secretary nominee Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Circular firing squads are a chronic cultural feature of Washington, DC bureaucracy, giving rise to the insider aphorism “Keep your head down, if they can’t see you they can’t shoot you.” Right up there with another of my favorites from dealing with the DC inside-the-beltway crowd: “If you want a friend in Washington, get a dog.” Understand those two, and you are a long way down the road toward understanding DC culture.
By way of disclosure and transparency, I have personally experienced the “Medical Freedom Movement” circular firing squad attacks (including from many associated with the Children’s Health Defense organization) for at least four years now. So, I have become a bit jaded and biased and refuse to associate myself with this “Movement.”
As far as I am concerned, the meta-issues are freedom in general, “Western” (US sphere of influence) government deployment of modern PsyWar, propaganda, and censorship technology against its own citizens, and the rise of a globalized centralized planning “government” structure grounded in utilitarian, neo-Malthusian, corporatist-socialist “stakeholder capitalism” logic.
J’accuse! Off with their heads!
The latest sin meriting the self-appointed “Medical Freedom Movement” firing squad seems to be the appearance of a quid pro quo. Whether or not one exists is above my pay grade. I am not one of the “Mar-a-Lago” caste. But I do know some who are, and they will still respond to text inquiries from me from time to time.
The apparent compromise being that it is currently politically acceptable to question the false narrative of the natural origin of SARS-CoV-2, but not acceptable to criticize the “Safe and Effective” narrative that has been constructed around the gene therapy-based “vaccine” products expressing the toxic engineered Spike protein, and absolutely not acceptable (within Trump world) to criticize the wholesale jettisoning of international regulatory, clinical development, and bioethical norms which characterized “Operation Warp Speed” (OWS).
There is a difference between the various people and what wave of newcomers they were in when merging into the MAHA movement. The earlier adopters look like the very first adopters of BTC and how they reason and think versus the later adopters and current noobies to BTC. The earliest adopters of MAHA are saying that the latest crop of noobies are not really qualified to participate in the leading of the MAHA group. Again, with all this going on the perfect has become the enemy of the good, too. Also, I think if Trump thinks that mRNA is a good thing, perhaps trying to change his mind on it is fatal to your ambitions for influence in the administration. Isn’t this the same, everywhere and always?