pull down to refresh
21 sats \ 4 replies \ @zapsammy 1 Mar \ on: Your AI Waifu Needs a GPLv3 License tech
thoughts:
private & closed-source software may become public & open-source as soon as a pretty good working model gets built, and once it's obvious that:
- the technology is really good and helps people in a significant way.
- profit-motivated corporations and men are starting to seriously look at the technology.
i have considered how the bitcoin memes will have to evolve in order to reorient the people who live thru Apple Vision goggles, and how the open-source AI agents will have to become good enough to be preferred over closed-source AI agents.
everything starts with proper education... of course state-sponsored education (really, education bought with UBI state tokens) will be more affordable and teach how to primarily use close-source state-funded tools.
"Train up a Satoshi in the way he should bitcoin: and when he is old, he will not depart from the way." Proverbs 22:6, KJV bitcoinized.
Deep Seek Whitepaper but deep seek is MIT licensed.
reply
reply
Take your favorite proprietary software application, decompile the binary, share it around and post it on github and experience for yourself how much that application creator cares about their license in the form of a lawsuit.
Even though the makers of ublock origin have too many people to sue to enforce the GPL on their code, they passed up an opportunity with not suing honey. People were angry enough at that one to actually donate to a lawsuit.
So yes people care, you might be exposed to a lot of people who don't care, but a lot of people care a lot.
reply
i wonder how the nostr-native (or similar) repositories will work. i don't like any type of licensing, the way it's done traditionally. merit is the "license," a widely acknowledged badge of honor. sounds like in order to get away from that mentality, everyone has to move away from GitHub to something that is inherently open-source.
reply