pull down to refresh
30 sats \ 9 replies \ @_stacktoshi 7 Mar \ on: Exquisite post from @BitPaine on the SBR reaction bitcoin
Fuck this. How is it a giant leap? Would an SBR still be wonderful if the govt just 6102'd MSTR and IBIT?
We're not cucked for wanting the world's most powerful and most indebted government to stop its fuckery, and allow plebs more time to take back their financial freedom.
SBR doesn't change their ability to 6102
And why would the NSA invent Bitcoin just to 6102 it? Retarded.
Everyone has had a 15 years to wake up, monetization of the next world reserve currency won't wait for angsty shitheads forever.
reply
Really trying to make sense of your first two statements... I never claimed otherwise and NSA??? Even if that crackpot theory turned out to be true, the left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing in government. Actually, if it was the NSA, 6102 would make perfect sense to secure "national wealth".
Who's money did they use to establish the SBR? Was it moral?
reply
The crackpot theory is the fairy tale that some lone wolf did it and stayed anonymous, when at a minimum the NSA has all the sigint necessary to know who it is and how to get their coins
the left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing in government
Doesn't need to, ops are need-to-know and compartmentalized... anything of importance is discussed in a SCIF
if it was the NSA, 6102 would make perfect sense
NSA made the ledger transparent and non-divisible, a free-float international currency they own a huge supply of, and can easily track state-scale movements to front-run any threats... they're not going to fuck up a clandestine op.
Try thinking strategically more than 5 minutes out before you poast.
Who's money did they use to establish the SBR? Was it moral?
Mixed bag whataboutism, future accumulation is the real story.
reply
So I’m cucked because I don’t want to celebrate all that, even if it were true?
The SBR validates our theses, yes. But we shouldn’t sit on our bags and allow them to abuse the “public purse” (stolen resources) to enrich themselves at the expense of those around us, good people who are just a bit slow to adjust to major changes.
reply
Exactly, so cucked to the identity of being a contrarian loser that winning of this scale elicits whataboutism and allegations of betrayed principles where none exist (generalizing for the edgelords on twitter specifically)
enrich themselves at the expense of those around us
This is a perfect example of something a perennial loser says to reveal they never truly appreciated Bitcoin for its game-theory
This is a victory over the Cantillon effect, such behavior was already happening, now the playing field has finally been leveled
people who are just a bit slow to adjust to major changes
Were always fucked, and now they'll be slightly less so, because the government they expect to render services to them will have more resources to do so in the form of a Bitcoin treasury
reply
Your definition of a loser seems to be someone who rejects thuggery & theft. But I'm really confused that your reject the Cantillon effect, which is thuggery to the nth degree. The mental gymnastics here...