pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 8 replies \ @fiatbad 8 Mar \ parent \ on: Exquisite post from @BitPaine on the SBR reaction bitcoin
I agree with your sentiment here. I think, in general, Bitcoiners are being far too complacent about solving Bitcoin's scaling issues before nation-states have taken total control of on/off ramps. And I'm not even talking about scaling for MoE... I mean just average people being able to self-custody without having to pay an annual salary worth of on chain fees.
However, I do want to push back on your comment here:
Sure, cashu bitcoin is not as good as on-chain, cold-storage bitcoin. But it's still very different from the current global banking systems. It's a massive improvement toward monetary freedom.
It's amazing tech, and I'm afraid it's not really being adopted mostly because of sentiment like you're pushing here.
Bitcoiners are being far too complacent about solving Bitcoin's scaling issues
Complacent? they're retarded and obsessed with scaling issues they made up because they don't understand how Bitcoin works.
The only scaling "issue", using that term loosely, is the one no one wants to talk about because it can't be fixed, supply. So, scammers have to lie and fabricate other ones. #906572
reply
reply
And look who he tagged in this more recent one:
reply
reply
He has legitimate grievances with Bitcoin Core, but that not enough attention is given to scaling issues is not one of them.
The scaling issues people talk about don't exist, the one that does exist can't be fixed because no one will go for a supply increase.
What we seem to agree on is that the Bitcoin Core repo should be archived to let changes succeed or fail on merit and not because people blindly trust and upgrade from one repo.
reply
reply