pull down to refresh

BTC doesn't scale.
What do you think stops a second Bitcoin chain from starting?
Nothing, there's already countless of them... all the earliest shitcoins are Bitcoin forks.... but they're all worthless because you can't invent digital scarcity twice or duplicate Bitcoin's security.
reply
Why can't the same consensus rules with a mining algo change produce similar security?
reply
Will you be asking the same question over and over, expecting different answer?
reply
Security comes from the scale of the network, for which there is inherently one Schelling point, the rules are irrelevant
reply
Obviously many people use other chains.
Mostly the consensus rules of those chains are not even close to Bitcoin. But in a sustained high fee environment, I don't see why a second Bitcoin couldn't emerge.
reply
I don't understand this conversation. People want Bitcoin... not 'other chains'. Have you guys seen the eth/btc chart lately?
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scoresby 8h
eth isn't bitcoin
People also use dollars, dollars are arguably better currency.
Litecoin is arguably better currency than Bitcoin too... could go on forever with a million other shitcoins, stablecoins, blah blah blah.
Yet a second Bitcoin cannot emerge, because Bitcoin is not just a currency. Misunderstanding this fundamental thing is what that leads people into crypto more broadly.
reply
I'm on board with Bitcoin as censorship resistant money.
I don't understand why it can only emerge once.