pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 12 replies \ @Scoresby 9h \ parent \ on: Scaling DEBUNKED: No More Than 5-10 Million Can Use Bitcoin, EVER! bitcoin
Obviously many people use other chains.
Mostly the consensus rules of those chains are not even close to Bitcoin. But in a sustained high fee environment, I don't see why a second Bitcoin couldn't emerge.
I don't understand this conversation. People want Bitcoin... not 'other chains'.
Have you guys seen the eth/btc chart lately?
reply
reply
If people created 'other chains' (they have) they wouldn't be Bitcoin. Bitcoin is what people want.
Something like liquid might be useful for scaling and liquidity management (I think it is honestly) but try mentioning that around here.
The uncomfortable truth is that if we had sustained 'high fees' for monetary/capital purposes... people would pay them.
The world's businesses and institutions plus upper-income people in 'developed' countries will pay the fees as necessary (just like they pay for things today).
reply
People also use dollars, dollars are arguably better currency.
Litecoin is arguably better currency than Bitcoin too... could go on forever with a million other shitcoins, stablecoins, blah blah blah.
Yet a second Bitcoin cannot emerge, because Bitcoin is not just a currency. Misunderstanding this fundamental thing is what that leads people into crypto more broadly.
reply
reply
Had just re-worded some things above before your res
Bitcoin is not a purely technical thing.
reply
I've read the page on numaraires before (I think the last time you referred me to it). But what I don't get is how it implies BTC exclusively.
If there is another source to read I'm happy to go there, but at the moment, I'm skeptical of anything that claims to be the one and only.
reply
implies BTC exclusively.
It implies exclusiveness generally. A standard.
I'm skeptical of anything that claims to be the one and only.
Bitcoin doesn't claim anything, it's simply recognized as such, which creates a gravity-well that compounds on itself.
Skeptical of what exactly? No one needs you just to believe something. You're either in the network that matters or one that doesn't. It is binary. Ignoring the network element would have you believe that every dev firing up a test network is replicating Bitcoin.
reply