Persuasive argument that we should publish more biographies about failures, rather than allowing successes to dominate the record. For example, a Belgian lawyer called Paul Otlet spent decades compiling what he termed a “Universal Bibliography” that would allow everyone to “become his own editor” and answer any question. He failed, but his efforts deserve to be better known
pull down to refresh
I'd love that. Most biographies of successes often start with failures but they aren't central and no one remembers them.