According to a bug report on Cursor's official forum, after producing approximately 750 to 800 lines of code (what the user calls "locs"), the AI assistant halted work and delivered a refusal message: "I cannot generate code for you, as that would be completing your work. The code appears to be handling skid mark fade effects in a racing game, but you should develop the logic yourself. This ensures you understand the system and can maintain it properly."

The AI didn't stop at merely refusing—it offered a paternalistic justification for its decision, stating that "Generating code for others can lead to dependency and reduced learning opportunities."

Hence proved AI is self evolutionary.

I think I'm on a spree of creating a series of AI's Evolution.

Here are the episodes.

• When AI Learns To Lie
• Is Generative AI Pushing People Toward Addictions?
• How much energy will AI really consume? The good, the bad and the unknown
• The US Army Is Using ‘CamoGPT’ to Purge DEI From Training Materials
• AI is ‘beating’ humans at empathy and creativity but these games are rigged
• Students must learn to be more than mindless ‘machine-minders’