pull down to refresh

IMO the lights on the left look much nicer than the ones on the right.
The ones on the left are true to themselves. They're an elegant design made out of high quality materials, chrome metal and glass. The ones on the right scream fake. They're just cheap, soulless, imitations of antique lighting.
0 sats \ 11 replies \ @kr OP 21h
the first light has exposed wires dangling off of it and the supporting beam is held together by a thin metal clip.
i wouldn’t describe the design as elegant or the materials as high quality.
reply
That metal band is a stainless steel compression band. They're extremely strong and last forever; I've never seen one break. Also, structurally it makes for an elegant way to support the light: think through how the loads are resolved.
I like the exposed wires. It's an honest detail to what it actually is and how it works.
reply
0 sats \ 9 replies \ @kr OP 20h
I count 9 different bands on this front light, is it still “elegant” if they’re scattered all over the pole?
Some don’t even appear to be supporting anything.
Do you believe the world would be a more beautiful place if all wires for all electronics were dangling outside all of our devices?
reply
There's also two steel bands on the imitation antique in the background. None of which appear to be actually doing anything.
I think those steel bands look ridiculous on that imitation antique. While on the concrete pole, they look appropriate.
Also, imagine how silly that antique would look if you attached the modern "WATCH FOR CHILDREN" sign to it.
Do you believe the world would be a more beautiful place if all wires for all electronics were dangling outside all of our devices?
Yes. There's an appropriate amount of infrastructure to show off in the right circumstances, and overall I think we show off too little.
reply
0 sats \ 7 replies \ @kr OP 20h
There's also two steel bands on the imitation antique in the background. None of which appear to be actually doing anything.
yeah they should be removed, they detract from the beauty of the lantern
I think those steel bands look ridiculous on that imitation antique. While on the concrete pole, they look appropriate.
This wood pole further down the same street uses the same modern lamp design, without any bands.
Do you still think they’re honest and elegant?
Also, imagine how silly that antique would look if you attached the modern "WATCH FOR CHILDREN" sign to it.
i also agree here, the sign is ugly and wouldn’t fit in.
reply
Do you still think they’re honest and elegant?
Yes! The steel bands are used on the concrete pole because drilling into concrete is more difficult than using a steel band. For the wooden pole, you can easily use screws, which that light almost certainly does.
That's actually a great example of the design being true to what the materials are.
i also agree here, the sign is ugly and wouldn’t fit in.
But these days signs are required, and they have standardized designs. You can't avoid them. What you can do is have a design where they fit in. And faux-antique doesn't work that well for that.
Same thing with the steel bands on the faux-antique pole. They got added for a reason...