pull down to refresh

Most of us probably have some familiarity with this through Chomsky and see this as an oxymoron, yet it narrows the window of disagreement to the nature of humans and concerns itself with changing minds because they hate the state too.
We do not equate socialism with planning, state control, or nationalization of industry, although we understand that in a socialist society (not “under” socialism) economic activity will be collectively controlled, managed, planned, and owned. Similarly, we believe that socialism will involve equality, but we do not think that socialism is equality, for it is possible to conceive of a society where everyone is equally oppressed. We think that socialism is incompatible with one-party states, with constraints on freedom of speech, with an elite exercising power ‘on behalf of’ the people, with leader cults, with any of the other devices by which the dying society seeks to portray itself as the new society.
An approach to socialism that incorporates cultural revolution, women’s and children’s liberation, and the critique and transformation of daily life, as well as the more traditional concerns of socialist politics. A politics that is completely revolutionary because it seeks to transform all of reality. We do not think that capturing the economy and the state lead automatically to the transformation of the rest of social being, nor do we equate liberation with changing our life-styles and our heads. Capitalism is a total system that invades all areas of life: socialism must be the overcoming of capitalist reality in its entirety, or it is nothing.
Trey had a note about Bitcoin being a great example of libertarian/anarcho socialism. That's a bit at odds with this description, since bitcoin is clearly not incompatible with capitalism.
Generally, I think it's a hopeless pursuit to have communal property, aside from very specific cases. Disputes about who's allowed to use what need to be quickly and clearly resolvable or complex societies grind to a halt.
reply
This caused some good discussion in the libertarian delegates signal group
reply