pull down to refresh

The proposal stresses that aid programs should have end dates and their success measured carefully. Among other ideas, it suggests using blockchain technology to help track funds and ensure accountability.
Doesnt this just end up cluttering the blockchain? Im sure there are better ways of ensuring accountability.
reply
I think the idea is to make the data public and untouchable, but I'm not sure.
reply
There are other ways of doing that. It doesnt need to be on the bitcoin blockchain.
reply
What other ways are there? I didn’t see anything saying it was on Bitcoin’s blockchain, where did you see that?
reply
I guess you are right, it didnt point out the bitcoin blockchain exactly.
But what other blockchain would they tie into?
reply
🤷‍♂️
reply
The entire federal government could make all its payments in one transaction every 2 weeks (or whatever their disbursement schedule is.)
The transparent ledger is part of the national security benefits of Bitcoin, it makes government spending transparent so we don't have another PPP/USAID situation where China sets up a bunch of fake orgs to get free USD.
reply
China is already getting 'free' USD... from its holding of US treasury bonds. Solution - sell fewer bonds???
reply
A little different ROI than setting up shell corps for thousands to take in billions.
Bonds act as an extension of the money supply because they're dollar+, so less bonds = stablecoin minter go brrrr, which seems to be the plan
reply
reply