pull down to refresh

There’s no doubt the United States needs to make dramatic spending cuts to prevent itself from spiraling—either downward into an eventual debt default or upward into hyperinflation. If you want a primer on why that is, I’d recommend listening to this one-hour, simple-to-understand synopsis of the country’s financial position, followed by this appearance by Jim Bianco on the Julia LaRoche podcast a couple of days ago.
Right now, the political climate consists of Republicans taking a chainsaw to anything they can get their hands on in government to cut spending, and Democrats protesting any and all cuts for any reason they can drum up. Hashing out individual issues worthy of cuts is not what this article is about, so we’ll save that discussion for another day.
This article is meant to point out the fatal hypocritical flaw that exists in Democrats’ reasoning as it relates to the country’s financials. Everybody understands the simple idea that if we run up too much debt, the country could, in essence, go bankrupt. But what’s really alarming now is the pace at which we are running up this debt. It’s why this chart of the national debt is going parabolically higher. The number $35 trillion is astonishing — but the rate with which we are moving higher is beyond breakneck…..
And what you’ll notice in the chart is that the gap between the lowest 50% of the nation and the top 10% continues to widen. In other words, this is a problem that is getting worse, accelerating and shows no signs of stopping today. On this trajectory, at some point, quality of life for the bottom 50% of the nation is going to get so poor that someone will make this same point on a platform that garners significant attention, and it’s going to click with more everyday people. Maybe at that point, both parties will come together and have a legitimate discussion about monetary policy.
But one thing is for sure: If a lot of center-left Democrats I know understood this point clearly, they might seriously reconsider what it is that their party claims to be fighting for in the first place. And if the concept takes hold and has time to sink in with the nation, it could wind up being yet another issue that Democrats lose a significant tranche of voters over—at a time when their party can least afford it.
Both parties are to blame for flawed monetary policy, but at least Republicans are now floating some sound money ideas and cuts that work toward balancing the budget. As for Democrats, they may say their interests are in increasing equity and equality for their voters, but the policies they put forth instead scream that they want the billionaires and the mega-rich to get significantly wealthier, while the bottom 50% of the nation’s quality of life continues to be brutalized.
Yes, but, but, but my equity! This is why the leftist policy is doing exactly the opposite of what they are looking for it to do. Is this intentional or not? Do they want the top 1% to get much better while the bottom 50% get hammered? Their policies are leading to that exact result whether that is the intention or not.
Democratic policies... are the exact opposite of what you said.
The republican party in its current form has zero interest or plan to meaningfully reduce spending or 'balance the budget.' Deficits are just as high, if not higher (from what I understand) as under the Biden administration and the Republican party wants nothing to do with actual deficit reduction.
All the Doge stuff is just for show... it's a drop in the bucket and mostly theater. The Republicans have extended the 2017 tax cuts which mostly effect 'high earners' with only small spending cuts... in other words the deficit continues.
As far as wealth inequality... that would be the Republicans however both parties are guilty. The Republican tax cuts overwhelmingly effect 'wealthy' people and high earners.... and their tariffs (which are consumption taxes) effect mostly... poor people and the working class. The working class sees prices go up on cheap imported goods (which they need) and the taxes on higher earners go down.
Does this help 'poor people'?
Both parties have been all-in on free trade the last 30 years. The problem is that while costs and supply chains have spread and diversified, the benefits have not been 'equal' all around. Now the US has an economic competitor, the first really in 100 years in the form of China, and the Republican response is... denial.
Tariffs won't help the US, neither will bluster and 'the culture wars' but the Republicans can't come up with anything else... because a real solution requires Americans to learn something, go back to school, get additional training and understand the world is more competitive.
Which makes voters (all voters) uncomfortable. So the denial goes on, and the 'tariffs' and proposed 'solutions' from Republicans probably do more harm than good to the US economy.
reply
This article was about the policies of the progressive/lefty/collectivist/Marxist/socialist/communist/murderers not the other idiots!
The progressive/lefty/collectivist/Marxist/socialist/communist/murderers’ policies work exactly opposite of what they are looking for: equity and equality. They are generating more inequity and inequality than other policies and the results were shown in the graph. Actually, Murkans have to get off their China envy kick and work on their own problems, with the exclusion of all of the graft and corruption going on.
reply