Nothing says “the true bitcoin” like having a button for third parties to seize funds
reply
Aka single participant consensus :)
NOTE: It is also possible to have a large reorg towards the block whose header is not the best and also not have block // with most work available during reorg. In this case confiscation transactions in blocks on new chain will not // not be assumed whitelisted (even if block is deep enough) because here we do not yet know how deep the block is // in the new chain. // Such cases are rare and are assumed to be handled manually by the node operator in the same way as if a new block // with non-whitelisted confiscation transaction is mined. }
reply
This is just a commit, does someone has link to the actual PR?
reply
It’s just a commit. I made an assumption that they had a review process. My bad
reply
How don't they get that making it more complicated = making it worse 😂
reply
My guess is they are aligning themselves with regulators
reply
inb4 the consensus rules for confiscation either (a) allows any UTXO to be confiscated by anyone, or (b) introduces an inflation bug.
reply
What a shitcoin lol
reply
Its for the greater good?
reply
I’m guessing the idiot plans to claim the copy of satoshi funds under his already almost irrelevant clown chain and dump it on the remaining clowns to pay for litigations.
reply
well, they shouldn't have a problem with it since according to BSV users, he is the real satoshi
reply
I was struggling to find the actual whitelist. Looks like its configuration defined?
reply