Widespread adoption of bitcoin as a monetary unit, in place of fiat currencies like the U.S. dollar, would tightly control or completely eliminate a government’s ability to print money. Just as the gold standard kept U.S. spending largely in check, a bitcoin standard will limit spending on military adventures abroad and costly programs at home. Government programs will need the support of the people to continue receiving funding, or else the increased taxation needed to fund those programs will lead to voting out politicians who support them. The feedback loop of rising spending between government and supported industries — like the arms industry in the U.S. — will largely disappear as public sentiment plays a larger role in allocation of government funds.
pull down to refresh
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined 12 Nov 2022
This is one of the arguments for the gold standard, as well. It strikes me that one advantage Bitcoin has over gold is the inability to shave or dilute the coin. The other mechanism used by the state seems to still be in play, though. In war time, governments just issue paper currency and insist that they will redeem it when the war is over. This shifts the taxation to after the war and often it's the losers of the war who are made to pay reparations.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @harambe OP 12 Nov 2022
there are no winners of war these days.
the only winner that humanity has left is Bitcoin because it is the power that walks on the water and makes the darkness tremble
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @01xCc 12 Nov 2022
чем быстрее перейдем на эту монету тем быстрее закончатся все воины... а та страна которая не захочет переходить на биткоин стандарт и будет показывать свою агрессию... все очевидно... нет монет для ВПК нет конфликтов...
reply