Bitcoin Dev mailing list deplatformed from Google Groups \ stacker news ~bitcoin

pull down to refresh

Bitcoin Dev mailing list deplatformed from Google Groups x.com/SomsenRuben/status/1907498089667059733

47.1k sats \ 30 comments \ @saunter 2 Apr bitcoin

view all related items

19 sats \ 0 replies \ @BitByBit21 9h

307 sats \ 1 reply \ @petertodd 3 Apr

This has now been reversed, and the mailing list has been restored: https://x.com/kanzure/status/1907622313547182541

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nitter 3 Apr bot

https://xcancel.com/kanzure/status/1907622313547182541

193 sats \ 6 replies \ @optimism 3 Apr

I'm sure this all went through each of our individual minds as "what can possibly go wrong" when the move happened and we all fell into the trap of gaslighting ourselves that this would not happen.

It happened. Sovereignty is a thing.

1000 sats \ 0 replies \ @Car 3 Apr

we were all witness to it, sn has a long memory.

#307922

150 sats \ 4 replies \ @kepford 3 Apr

The abuse of the term gaslighting needs to stop. It's getting as bad as the use of the word ironic.

75 sats \ 3 replies \ @optimism 3 Apr

Ironically i agree. sorry couldn't help myself.

3000 sats \ 2 replies \ @kepford 3 Apr

Eh, I'm not proud of my comment. Glad you took it well. I need breakfast I think.

73 sats \ 1 reply \ @optimism 3 Apr

Coffee is on me ❤️

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @kepford 3 Apr

Thanks, you didn't have to do that :)

reply on another page

349 sats \ 4 replies \ @south_korea_ln 3 Apr

Move over to SN?

21 sats \ 0 replies \ @Car 3 Apr

Honestly they be better off getting a territory on SN. Given enough time they could run their own instance of it too.

100 sats \ 1 reply \ @SimpleStacker 3 Apr

Best solution

31 sats \ 0 replies \ @south_korea_ln 3 Apr

3 sats \ 0 replies \ @sime 3 Apr

Academic mailing lists have traditionally always been on mailing lists.

But a fun thought experiment.

194 sats \ 1 reply \ @BitcoinIsTheFuture 3 Apr

Nostr?

270 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 3 Apr

From @petertodd:

Strong NACK on nostr. It's a badly designed, centralized, protocol that needs a significant redesign to be usable. While off topic for this mailing list, some of its many issues include:

Reliance on single-key, cryptography that often results in people having their keys compromised. This is a serious problem in the context of bitcoin-dev, where faked messages published could easily have market-moving results.

Inability to mirror relays: since nostr deliberately ignores the lessons of blockchains, there is no way to be sure that you have a complete set of messages from a given person, for a given topic, etc.

Highly centralized design: since mirroring relays isn't reliable, in reality nostr operates in a highly centralized fashion, dependent on a tiny number of relays that can't be easily replaced if taken down.

source

13 sats \ 0 replies \ @nym 3 Apr

That didn’t take long. I thought that was an odd choice.

21 sats \ 0 replies \ @nout 3 Apr

It should be fixed now.

21 sats \ 0 replies \ @OT 3 Apr

I mean, come on.... What did they expect?

Maybe time for nostr or perhaps a SN territory?

14 sats \ 0 replies \ @itsMoro 3 Apr

hopefully it gets cleared up, but there must be a better solution long term.

100 sats \ 7 replies \ @SimpleStacker 3 Apr

@k00b @ek

I zapped 2,370 CCs to this post, which I think might be a bug of some kind. I did try to zap 30 sats to it, and you can see that it failed and retried multiple times until finally succeeding. But somehow it also made me spend 2,370 CCs (my entire CC balance) on it.

I'm pretty sure it's not user error, because zapping that much would have required me to long-press and enter 2,370 into the field, which I'm 100% sure I didn't do.

100 sats \ 5 replies \ @k00b 3 Apr

Leading hypothesis is that saunter's attached wallet times out slowly, and because we have network error retry logic on the client, we retry as it times out, then those retries time out, which triggers the retry again, and so on.

I've disabled the retry logic on the client for anything that costs money. We are currently trying to reproduce to confirm this is the exact issue.

0 sats \ 4 replies \ @k00b 3 Apr

I'll refund all zappers on this item. Looks like saunter's wallet triggered the bug perfectly well for nearly everyone that zapped it. Me most of all.

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @SimpleStacker 3 Apr

I think you refunded me more than what was lost. I got a 9,000 refund but only lost 2,370 to this bug.

30 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 3 Apr

Consider it a bonus for alerting us + extra for pain and distress. :)

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @SimpleStacker 3 Apr

Like I said, u lawful bro

reply on another page

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 3 Apr

It hit you the most because you had the most CCs I guess

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 3 Apr

This bug affected me too. Looking into it.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nitter 2 Apr bot

https://xcancel.com/SomsenRuben/status/1907498089667059733