Is this a good idea or a bad one?
Would this increase privacy?
pull down to refresh
2 sats \ 1 reply \ @kilianbuhn 13 Nov 2022
What would be the problem with Lightning? 🤔
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @u 13 Nov 2022
Or fedimint?
reply
5 sats \ 0 replies \ @senf 13 Nov 2022
Like Payjoin? https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/PayJoin
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @kristapsk 13 Nov 2022
Obvious thing any merchant could to is to enable / integrate Payjoin (supported by BTCPay Server). Not only it increases privacy, also reduces receiver's UTXO set, so you can always argue you are doing that to save on future transaction fees, not that you want to hide something.
Similarly you could receive into JoinMarket yield generator wallet, which would run in background and also not only increase privacy, but earn you some coinjoin fees and other parties will again pay for UTXO consolidation.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @inevitable 13 Nov 2022
It's kinda fascinating, all this struggle for privacy would be largely irrelevant if not for the income tax.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @sommerfeld 13 Nov 2022
Unless the point of sale is processing house purchases to drug dealers, lightning would be a better fit.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @2bithits 13 Nov 2022
I guess it would depend on the size of the transaction.
Lightning for smaller transactions
reply