pull down to refresh

In a selloff, valuation discipline is everything.
Yet one powerful signal often gets ignored: Forward P/E vs. the S&P 500.
Most focus on absolute P/E, but the relative view reveals mispricings the market misses.
3 must-know cases for investors
Case 1: Multiple Expansion – $WMT
Walmart’s forward P/E has steadily widened vs. the S&P 500 — now trading at a 60% premium.
But with tariffs returning, is that valuation stretch still justified?
Case 2: Stable Valuation – $MSFT
Microsoft’s forward P/E has closely tracked the S&P 500 over time, showing remarkable consistency.
No wild swings. No big discounts or premiums.
Case 3: Multiple Contraction – $NVDA
After years of trading at a steep premium, Nvidia’s forward P/E has fallen sharply — now nearly in line with the S&P 500.
Is the market offering a rare opportunity… or pricing in a reset?
Takeaways: in volatile markets, context is everything.
Forward P/E relative to the S&P 500 helps cut through noise — whether it’s $WMT stretching, $MSFT staying steady, or $NVDA compressing.
Ignore it, and you miss the signal.
Great advice. I myself is someone who never looks at forward P/E vs S&P. Good way to value the future of a company
reply
It makes all the difference! The relative P/L helps you see value that goes unnoticed in the middle of the market average.
reply