pull down to refresh
47 sats \ 3 replies \ @SimpleStacker 8 Apr \ parent \ on: Tariffs as a Pragmatic Compromise econ
Yeah, I wonder why that is. Even when you draw the deadweight loss triangles in Econ 101, those triangles are usually quite a bit smaller for tariffs than for taxes.
My only theory is because "Smoot Hawley" is a commonly taught in history classes. I don't think there's a comparable event for general taxation.
I suspect it's because free trade is a pillar of the WEF/globalist agenda and has been for at least a generation.
reply
Don't submit to their framing, they are not for free trade, it's the lack of free trade that is why the tariffs are necessary in the first place.
reply
Even so, whatfor?
Surely taxes on (low-)income peeps ought to be even more fitting for their stories than tariffs?
reply