BSV Hardfork - Security Considerations \ stacker news ~bitcoin

BSV Hardfork - Security Considerations blog.bitmex.com/bitcoin-sv-hardfork-significant-security-risks/

127 sats \ 4 comments \ @k00b 14 Nov 2022 bitcoin

543 sats \ 0 replies \ @cryptocoin 14 Nov 2022

Jameson Lopp making sure the message gets out!

FYI @bitfinex, @RobinhoodApp, @kucoincom, @BittrexExchange, @Gateio_Startup, @Poloniex, @okx, @coinexcom, and anyone custodying BSV... your security model is about to degrade.

https://blog.bitmex.com/bitcoin-sv-hardfork-significant-security-risks

https://twitter.com/lopp/status/1592180908664446978 [Nitter]

314 sats \ 0 replies \ @MKZI 15 Nov 2022

As if this wasn't always faketoshi's end game.

Try to gain legitimacy through legal means to blindside his followers, so he can hard fork and rest control over Satoshi's treasure on his shitcoin network.

321 sats \ 1 reply \ @petertodd 15 Nov 2022

The best part:

The details around the whitelist are not included in the repository, therefore it is not clear what transactions are included in the whitelist or how transactions may be added.

Not only is BSV centralized due to this whitelist, they won't even tell you the details. Utterly insane.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b OP 15 Nov 2022

Nice to get some confirmation. I couldn’t find the whitelist either feeling around.