pull down to refresh

This means that the dust attack transactions, despite being only 4.86% of all dust creating transactions, allow to cluster 66.43% of all dust induced clustered addresses. Considering the whole data set, the transactions suspected of being part of dust attacks are only 0.008% of all transactions but allow to cluster 0.14% of all addresses that would have otherwise remained isolated.
Anyone know who is conducting these dust attacks? Is it chainanalysis or law enforcement? They seem at least partially effective.
@ek how is #927483 going? Did you get any takers?
56 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 16 Apr
Also, bear in mind that control over one’s privacy isn’t entirely in the hands of the individual. When one user’s privacy is lost, that degrades the privacy of all other users. Through the process of elimination, which suggests a linear progression of privacy decay, every successfully deanonymized user can be discounted as a possible candidate when attempting to deanonymize the transactions of the remaining users. In other words, even if you take precautions to protect your privacy, there will be no crowd to blend into if others don't take precautions, too.
It won't make you popular but bitcoiners once shamed each other for KYCing haphazardly. Consider making yourself a pariah like it's 2021.
reply
33 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 16 Apr
Oh, you reminded me that I still have to send @Longtermwizard some dust. He volunteered in #927583 😅
@remindme in 3 days
reply