pull down to refresh
33 sats \ 5 replies \ @nout 18 Apr
That's a bit surprising - wouldn't we expect to see Acinq there too? Not just CLN?
reply
190 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 19h
I think you can’t use Phoenix(d) because they don’t allow you to change the BOLT12 description which is required for OCEAN payouts … or something like that.
@siggy47 probably knows more.
reply
59 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 19h
Yeah. That's my understanding. I think @BitcoinMechanic explained it on a video recently. I think he said he had discussed it with Phoenix and that they may make some changes to make it compatible.
reply
46 sats \ 2 replies \ @k00b OP 18 Apr
People using OCEAN might be more likely to run their own nodes is my guess. It's also unclear how many individuals this is. They've found 11,860 blocks according to their dashboard so they're making <2 lightning payments for each block they've found.
reply
86 sats \ 0 replies \ @clr 23h
I think that figure also includes blocks that were mined by Eligius pool back in the day. Ocean itself should be way less.
reply
12 sats \ 0 replies \ @028559d218 15h
I've taken Ocean payouts via Lightning for home mining... and it worked great. I was kind of impressed to be honest.
reply
83 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 18 Apr
I was the recipient of a few (tiny) transactions! It still felt good.
reply
36 sats \ 0 replies \ @nitter 18 Apr bot
https://xcancel.com/GrassFedBitcoin/status/1913008051936002077
reply