He makes these predictions in this interview:
pull down to refresh
33 sats \ 1 reply \ @franzap 1h
Is there a "remind me in one year" bot here on SN? So we can all laugh at how his silly prediction did not materialize?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b OP 1h
Yep @remindme
Rules are in the bio
reply
33 sats \ 2 replies \ @BlokchainB 3h
So does this mean k00b no longer have to do pull requests and @ek can stop reminding me to push code every day?
reply
50 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 1h
I see, you’re not remembering your dreams
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @BlokchainB 1h
I do. Just life gets in the way
reply
110 sats \ 0 replies \ @south_korea_ln 4h
Not sure about the real programming world, but for sure not in the academic programming one. Admittedly, it's maybe not the same, as the coding is just the tool and not the end goal. The AI is probably a net positive for the physicists who were already good. I'm now using algorithms of CS that i never thought of using, getting to the final objective faster and using a straighter road, but I don't see the AI actually getting there by itself. Let's see what the future brings. I still see it struggling too much with actual reasoning. I don't like to call it reasoning yet as that's not what it is actually doing under the hood. Anyhow. Let's see~~
How long before you think you can tell the AI: go through all the issues on my GitHub project and propose PRs for each one. Make sure to follow the conventions from our codebase and follow the style from @ek and myself. We won't have time to review it so ask the other AI agent to take care of it.
reply
33 sats \ 4 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 4h
Doubt
reply
100 sats \ 3 replies \ @k00b OP 2h
In many ways predictions are just people saying aloud what they want to happen.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 1h
Because they have nothing to lose
Nobody is going to remember or care if they were wrong but if they turn out to be right, everybody is going to think they are a genius
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 2h
I think you’re absolutely correct. I have no context on the speaker in the video.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b OP 2h
Used to be CEO of Google
reply
16 sats \ 0 replies \ @OT 3h
That's a bold claim.
reply
100 sats \ 14 replies \ @Dkryptoenth 3h
A bold claim indeed @OT, but I won't be surprised if the programming world gets @k00b and replaced with AI, even in @south_korea_ln AI is already taking over and it's best no one doubts it cos @WeAreAllSatoshi and with Satoshi, everything is possible.
reply
120 sats \ 13 replies \ @OT 3h
This reply is exactly why AI is unlikely to replace the vast majority of programmers in the next few years.
reply
0 sats \ 12 replies \ @Dkryptoenth 3h
Lol... thanks
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Dkryptoenth 1h
@k00b Now I think you're been rude and irrational
reply
0 sats \ 10 replies \ @OT 2h
Oh, you're not a bot?
reply
0 sats \ 9 replies \ @k00b OP 2h
Just a scammer
reply
0 sats \ 8 replies \ @Lazy_AMA 1h
Drop the scam proof here, so we'd all see
view all 8 replies
55 sats \ 0 replies \ @kr 6m
Elon has made similar predictions about driverless cars for 11-12 years now, and the lesson I've learned in watching these predictions unfold is that the edge cases are really hard.
I wonder if the same thing happens with programming. It's easy for AI to generate standard templates using well understood languages, but how do you effectively prompt it to build something new?
reply