pull down to refresh

I never wanted a layover so bad.
It’s difficult to evaluate an architectural movement that exists almost entirely in conceptual terms. At present, the closest thing stylistically to Solarpunk architecture might be Singapore’s Garden City: a political initiative introduced by Lee Kuan Yew in 1967 to transform the dense city into an urban environment brimming with greenery. In recent years, Singaporean architecture has produced dozens of stunning projects evoking the Solarpunk ethos: the Supertree Groves, the Cloud Fountain, the Jewel Changi Airport and the Marina Bay Sands are but a few prominent examples. Such projects regularly make waves on the Solarpunk Reddit to varying degrees of approval, and some Redditors have offered mitigated praise for the city with the slogan: “Singapore minus cars = Solarpunk”.
@cryotosensei what do you think?
Singapore usually gets high marks for its efficiency of government, and (perhaps unsurprisingly), it has one of the highest paid leaders out of all government leaders.
But then, the tradeoff for that efficiency is less freedom. I wonder how many Westerners would accept that trade?
reply
What an existentialist question to chew on on my way to work.
By freedom, I assume you mean the freedom of speech? The short answer is, you never really know what you are missing out on if you never have had it in the first place. Singapore runs like clockwork, so if that means a ban of protests/demonstrations and a designated Speaker’s Corner for people to air their views candidly, I don’t see any problems frankly.
Coincidentally, our elections are coming. 3rd May, in fact. I guess the disadvantage of having a paternalistic state is that we never get to elevate our level of discourse. 1) politics are dirty, so there is plenty of mudslinging and name-calling from supporters of the ruling party and opposition parties alike, 2) people are preoccupied with bread and butter issues, so their lens are pretty much fixated on money money and more money. But to be fair, I don’t think our national character should be attributed as a shortcoming of our government. Many factors are in play. The majority of us are ethnically Chinese (and 华人就是爱钱 lol), we are in a highly dense country, where comparing with the Joneses is easy and inevitable, and we have the struggling Islander mentality, in which we are afraid that we won’t have money in the future.
In short, money talks, freedom not so much
reply
Aren't there quite a few more restrictions than that? Like rules on who can own a car, how many cars you can own, who can buy a house, etc?
reply
No lar!
有钱好办事
There are housing rules that we must abide by - but if you are affluent, I don’t think there is anything to stop you from buying multiple private properties
reply
I remember walking through an arboretum once and thinking how cool it would be to live in. Now, I'd probably just prefer being outdoors, but I would love to try out a biodome scenario.
reply
Never heard of this
reply