pull down to refresh
300 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 23 Apr \ on: Open questions to devs concerning LLMs devs
Yes. Because the incentive for an open internet remains the same. Also there's an additional incentive now: without an open internet, AI will become incredibly expensive. After all, Zuck & Co allegedly trained llama on libgen...
However I expect that traffic to social media, news sites and information repositories will decrease as people will allow the AI to middleman their interactions. Which sucks. But maybe one day we get to the matrix-style download packages.
Hopefully AI coders will gravitate more towards open source. Some do today and there's alignment between sovereign compute and sovereign money. But that's a minority in AI and a majority in Bitcoin, so overall there isn't much alignment I feel. The VC bros will be VC broing AI all the same though.
It never does. No matter how advanced AI gets, there's still use for coders that understand the output or can weed out errors. If not white hat then black hat. We'll see.
Yes. It's an art form to bring your idea into existence, this also goes for code. However, coded ideas will probably become a commodity now. I think that this just means tons more of bad ideas being realized but that's okay, because the value of a great idea won't change because of that. There still be good trees inside the forest.