pull down to refresh

Uh-hu... failed.
These may all be for idiosyncratic reasons but they add up to an environment where the broader attractiveness of Britain as a place for banks to operate is once again under scrutiny. ... Challenger banks say their ambitions to grow have been damped down by disproportionate and complex regulations, including capital requirements.
  • ring-fencing req
  • bail-in debt (that regulators can force-convert to equity
One of the ways officials tried to achieve this was by promoting so-called challenger banks that were meant to take on the incumbents. But despite regulators deliberately handing out more banking licences to newcomers in order to foster competition, the UK’s retail banking market remains dominated by the largest historic players.
Looks in dire need of some shaking up:
This one is pretty nice, for a comparison of bank branches per capita across countries:
Based Bitcoiner response: What, we still need banks?

let them eat (bank)cake!


non-paywalled here: https://archive.md/w6ZcR
Is it banking that needs more competition, or is it the currency that needs more competition?
reply
in a layer-2/3 fiat money/credit-based money system there's little distinction between those two
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @000w2 3h
Large banks will get bailed out, small ones won't. Not a difficult choice to make.
reply
This competition is going to be decided by crypto
reply