We know this since he reported a crash 1st time he ran the client on Sourceforge.
In the debug file last block see by node was 49.
pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @LibertasBR 30 Apr
Did he wait anxiously for 7 days to be able to mention this in his own emails?
reply
19 sats \ 3 replies \ @raw_avocado OP 30 Apr
Bitcoin v0.1 announcment Cryptography Mail List
- Thu Jan 8 14:27:40 EST 2009 --convert to UTC---> Thu Jan 8 19:27:40 UTC 2009
Block 1 time
- 2009-01-09 02:54:25 UTC
So he pretty much started next day. In the private email with satoshi he did say he does not have time and will look at it next day.
(time here is PST btw)
Source:
- https://web.archive.org/web/20220507011230/https://cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/coindesk/66FEUFUEIVC3LOIOA6ESVKGGKM.png
- https://web.archive.org/web/20220507011228/https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2020/11/26/previously-unpublished-emails-of-satoshi-nakamoto-present-a-new-puzzle/
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @LibertasBR 30 Apr
Do you have any previous contacts? Like Satoshi had with Adam Back about the mention of the article.
I don't know much about the story, I'm learning little by little.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @raw_avocado OP 30 Apr
Yes, wrote about it yesturday: #966663
- The Adam Back emails were hosted in this drop box initially but not available: https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/4y3gdele4foy15006z8ch/h/Witness%20Statements?dl=0
- Someone achieved them here: https://github.com/lugaxker/nakamoto-archive/blob/main/src/adam-back-exhibit-ab1.pdf
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @LibertasBR 30 Apr
I wrote it wrong, sorry. I meant, do you know previous contacts between Hal and Satoshi, just like Adam did? I saw your post about Adam and I was hooked. I really like these stories and your posts are good because you put links and everything.
reply