pull down to refresh

What the OP_RETURN saga may teach us

This days the bitcoin community is super busy fighting over this OP code. When things like this happen I usually ask myself where the dark side is hiding because it is always not in the place we are looking. The DS is cunning, stealth and master of lies, it has a characteristic though, it let you think that being with it is being right, superior, incorruptible.
There are people that always recognize where the DS is, others that are completely unaware of it and others that are sometimes aware of it and sometimes fall for it and get deceived(temporarily). I humbly put myself in the third option and so to say that I got initially fooled by it also this particular time.
So where is hiding in this debate? What we know for now is that No one of the "factions" tells the whole truth.
In fact if spam filters do not work and are impossible to apply because no one knows really how to differentiate real monetary transactions from data please explain to me how mempool.space is doing it; because there I can clearly select data transactions and get them told apart from the others one.
So what we know is that spam filters works, are they 100% effective? Of course not but they work and work well enough to make a difference and discourage the majority of exploiters. But and there is a but here if all the energy of the core devs has to be spent in developing spam filters then you know...On the other end if we permit everything and yields to every request that some groups of individual asks and this also in what may be interpreted in a sort of "ransom" way, bitcoin will not end well.
What we seems to have here apart from all the technical views is a problem of polarization of views and opinions.
We have two factions with polar opposite apparently irreconcilable views that are fighting each others to the detriment of all bitcoin ecosystem and more so since they are all "bitcoiners" more or less, but with different views. Of course they are actively participating and succeeding, I might say, in destroying what they are trying to protect.
So we have bitcoiners with different views that are fighting between them to the extent that if one of the factions would manage to "win" we may risk of having bitcoin destroyed or seriously fucked up. One faction want to open everything and change everything as fast as possible and transform bitcoin scripts in a touring complete language; the other want to close everything and police every transaction to the last byte to see only the "holy" ones allowed on chain. I think that we can all see the problem here and were this would lead bitcoin if one of them win and I can say to you that the end won't be pretty.
So where is the Dark side hiding?
Of course Mr.Loop and the supporters of his faction know that for them it is hiding in the other side that we may call the Mr.Mechanic faction. One side will say that the other is "corrupted" by the dark side of the force and war will surely ensue with core devs sort of in the middle with some of them taking side also.
So again where is the Dark side hiding?
It is hiding in the polarization, it is dividing the community to win it and do its things that are the dark-ification of bitcoin and so its ultimate destruction because what the DS infects it sooner or later uglify and self destroy 100% no exceptions. Dark side wants you to take side, to be partisan of one faction and one faction only so it can control you because you lost yourself in the "holy" cause.
What is the solution then? We can try to answer a question first, what was bitcoin made for? Data or Money?
Bitcoin was invented for a monetary purpose no one would deny it; it was not made nor intended as a distributed general purpose data storage system so if we try to transform it into that it will not be bitcoin anymore. You cannot have an hybrid: you are the best monetary asset or you are the best data storage system you cannot have both in the same thing because it will shit like a monetary assets and shit even more like a storage system. What will happen then? No one will use it anymore for both use cases.
When the bitcoin community will reach an agreement over that question then this all thing will come to an end and solutions will came forward and get implemented, till then pray for you money. If you invested in bitcoin going on with this polarization DS stuff will bring bitcoin to a monetary value of zero, not now, not next year, but look no too far away in the future.
I do not know Mr. Loop personally but from what I might know what I see is a decent, intelligent fellow and I can surely say the same things for Mr.Mechanic too, I didn't know him personally but from what I saw in his last video I can surely say so.
So What to do?
People need to speak to each others, came to a table and speak, speak about everything and also about what bitcoin is for.
Then may be Mr. Loop may begin to invest his time and money differently, if he feels to invest in things that require a data storage system he may engage his resources in building "bitdata" a new protocol that would become the bitcoin of data storage system and it will be the best at it, the number one, no second best. It might also communicate with bitcoin for the monetary part if that would be necessary, they might be united in a sort of second layer, I leave to his superior intelligence the details. In the same spirit the other faction may concentrate the limited developer time and manpower of the core devs in strengthening the bitcoin monetary capabilities instead of wasting it in other less useful things and one of this useful things might be the spam problems also but with moderation and wise thinking. Again i leave this to theirs superior intelligence and smartness.
The future of bitcoin depend on his community of users, entrepreneurs and developers, they need to speak with each others and recognize what is bitcoin good for and use other solutions for the things that it was not created for. Trying to build a fit for every use system is not a win strategy in fact it is the opposite. You might find a way to do email with http but...
So what we know is that spam filters works, are they 100% effective? Of course not
these are mempool policies, not spam filters. Even if you decided ok we're "filtering the spam" from now on...
and you said hey "we're fixing the bugs too!" you would need > 90% of nodes with these new 'filters' to keep the inscriptions from getting into blocks.
And at that point the nft people or memecoin people could just... run an older version of bitcoin core (assuming that core changed mempool policy) making "the filters" completely moot. or they could run libre relay. or some other version that was still consensus-valid.
or they could just use mara slipstream and at only 1 sat/vb like in the current environment just pay 1000-2000$ and get literally an entire block with a big picture, a big jpeg occupying the entire block just for themselves.
and 'the filters' would do absolutely nothing. Even running knots you still 'store the jpeg' in disc space and now that the jpeg is 'more rare' or is 'mined by mara and banned by filters'...
Mara gets potentially more business are the prices of the jpegs go up.
it has 'war on drugs' vibes to it and i think that's what some developers want to avoid.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @dwami OP 3h
Yes, sure I see your point. There would be something that could be done and something that could not. The point is that polarization is not good for making any decision. I do not know what the right answer is or will be, what I know is that from this sort of climate no good actions would came. First stop the polarization, that is a DS trap, from that all sort of things would came in their own time. If something can be solved or attenuated or even left as it is will be seen when all the quarrel will cease then what can be done will be done.
reply
the solution is fee pressure, time, and the free world's education as to what bitcoin is. with education comes demand, with demand comes fee pressure, and w/ fee pressure little to no space for spam except that which is willing to pay large fees ('subsidies') to miners.
time education and fee pressure to conduct economic activity
reply