pull down to refresh
13 sats \ 2 replies \ @Undisciplined 10h \ parent \ on: The Case for Universities (Financial Times, Simon Kuper) econ
Irrelevant. I’m saying that these things don’t have to suck and wouldn’t if not for state intervention.
Ok, I concede that it's feasible that state-owned and state-financed entities work well (my village is excellent at clearing snow from the road, which the municipality pay farmers to do). But I wouldn't put hospitals in that camp
reply
That is laughable.
The publicly funded British Health Service is massively more effective in providing universal healthcare than the US privatised system where many people have little or no cover.
Public healthcare provision is one area where demonstrably state provision can be and is vastly more cost effective than the US privatised health system which is the least efficient most expensive least equitable in the developed world buy a large margin.
reply