pull down to refresh
226 sats \ 0 replies \ @Aardvark 10 May
I can't wait to hear the reviews on this. The larger my stack gets the more time I inevitably spend looking into security solutions. Also it looks like the payment accepted is BTC, you love to see it.
reply
105 sats \ 0 replies \ @Jon_Hodl 10 May
Great news.
I have had my eye on these for quite a while now, but 150,000 sats seems a little steep for just a single device.
That would run you like $450 just for a two of three set up
reply
48 sats \ 3 replies \ @ca 11 May
Poorly marketed. I don't get it, neeeext
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @utxoclub 22h
What don't you get about it? Focused on building not marketing yet
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @ca 19h
Why is it in any way better than the best alternatives?
reply
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @utxoclub 3h
Best multisig UX, fully sovereign self-custody without third parties, non-trusted key generation verified by phone/laptop, superior multisig privacy and lower onchain fees, protection against nonce-based exfiltration attacks, simple T-of-N recovery with no descriptor footguns, fully open-source software.
reply
21 sats \ 3 replies \ @Jerrianjb 10 May outlawed
stackers have outlawed this. turn on wild west mode in your /settings to see outlawed content.