That's not UBI, though.

Part of the logic of UBI is that it's much easier to administer and it justifies cutting lots of specific government expenditures because everyone is receiving funds to pay for the market versions.

Another part is that UBI allows more job transitions for everyone, which amongst other things puts pressure on employers to make their workplaces better for employees.

Undisciplined

econ

IF there was UBI who would fund it?

stack_harder

i mean yeah, i suppose the way i imagine it is basically like some kind of welfare where the goc would say if you're under this income level you need it, if you are already in a good job etc, then you wouldn't need it

kind of like super welfare 