pull down to refresh
10 sats \ 3 replies \ @LibreHans 16 May
So, a new place to add spam. It's a really simple question, do you think existing spam will move to that new place, or do you think that new spam will claim the new place, and that the old spam keeps using the old places? Will blocks be bigger or smaller because of this change?
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @anon 16 May
Smaller
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Norbert 16 May
If it becomes easier to broadcast transactions with larger OP_RETURN outputs, and more people do that, blocks become smaller. This is because each byte of OP_RETURN "costs" 4 vBytes, since it doesn't get the witness discount.
It's not clear that OP_RETURN outputs would take off in any meaningful way, but if we imagine a scenario where it totally did and blocks were chock full of only OP_RETURN data, those blocks would be 1MB large, and barely impact the UTXO set, while contributing a lot to fee pressure.
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @LibreHans 16 May
So in a world where we allow spam in witness data, spam in op_return might be less harmful. Sounds like we should allow less spam everywhere.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @jerrybature 23h
Who owns Bitcoin Core? Is Bitcoin core a consensus client? Who writes the rules of development? How long did it take for node runners to discover that their filters are useless?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @aPolitical 16 May freebie
Good morning everyone