pull down to refresh

35 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 17 May
Very nice and concise essay.
Pursuing emotional moderation or equilibrium ad infinitum is a form of death by armor. Albert Camus understood that, to truly lean into the intensity of being alive, you have to “live to the point of tears”—to be moved by beauty, to be hurt by connection, to be overwhelmed by the absolute absurdity of existence. This is the highest form of courage! Lao Tzu wrote: “The living are soft and yielding. The dead are rigid and stiff.” Stoicism is a shield for war, not a lifestyle design playbook.
reply
I see a bit of a low time preference vs. high time preference dichotomy here (stoicism being the former).
I will choose the former because it’s possible to learn to enjoy the “emotional moderation” of delaying gratification and find happiness that way.
But I’m a Bitcoiner hence my position on this is not surprising!
reply
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @office 17 May
I can only wholeheartedly disagree with that.
reply
Stoicism, far from being just a shield for war, offers a blueprint for a life well-lived, teaching us to be yielding yet resolute.
reply
deleted by author