Sweet music to the Bank of Canada's ears. Now they can get back to cutting.
pull down to refresh
0 new comment
70 sats \ 1 reply \ @BlokchainB 20 May
Haha under 2%!!
reply
0 new comment
121 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 20 May
I think their target is actually 1-3%, which is normally just an excuse to be slightly over 3%.
reply
0 new comment
40 sats \ 4 replies \ @Undisciplined 20 May
I guess your markets are flooded with goods that got hit by American tariffs.
reply
0 new comment
37 sats \ 2 replies \ @grayruby OP 21 May
Missed this comment. That's an interesting point. I wonder if producers are shipping less to the US and trying to sell more domestically.
reply
0 new comment
40 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined 21 May
I've heard about lots of American products just sitting around at ports, because the reciprocal tariffs made them unprofitable to export. Presumably, stuff like that's happening everywhere.
reply
0 new comment
36 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby OP 21 May
Makes a lot of sense.
reply
0 new comment
41 sats \ 0 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic 20 May
Try the statistics are the same kind as OBiden’s. It looks like this is a world-wide effort of the same statisticians.
reply
0 new comment
40 sats \ 2 replies \ @Coinsreporter 20 May
Canada isn't helping defiatization!!
If this keeps going, the day will come when it'll be 0% and will even go down in minus.
reply
0 new comment
17 sats \ 1 reply \ @grayruby OP 20 May
The government is going to spend lots of money to make up for any deflation.
reply
0 new comment
40 sats \ 0 replies \ @Coinsreporter 20 May
That may be the case but I see it as a worrying sign for Canada's economy.
Cuz...
At the core of fiat economies, if you're not having inflation, you aren't growing.
reply
0 new comment
40 sats \ 0 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic 20 May
Are these the same kind of statistics as those coming out of the US BLS under the OBiden administration? I note that they have been mutating over time to something less recognizable but more realistic. Maybe Carney is doing his magical motherWEFer thing.
reply
0 new comment
40 sats \ 2 replies \ @kurszusz 27 May
What do you think about it?
Is this a natural decrease or is it artificially generated (for some future purpose)?
reply
0 new comment
20 sats \ 1 reply \ @grayruby OP 27 May
Well I don’t believe the numbers but I think it is directionally correct that inflation is declining because the economy is slowing down.
reply
0 new comment
40 sats \ 0 replies \ @kurszusz 27 May
This is true.
I also think that this is also a tool to explain certain central bank decisions (for example, massive money printing)
reply
0 new comment
20 sats \ 0 replies \ @Dkryptoenth 20 May
Nice one
reply
0 new comment