...
The dominance of the top 10 stocks has grown steadily over the past few decades. In 1990, they made up about 20% of the index. Today, they’re approaching 40%.
To put this into perspective, even at the height of the dot-com bubble, concentration levels hovered just under 30%. The current figures mark a significant departure from historical norms—and a potential warning sign for investors concerned about concentration risk.
...
https://www.visualcapitalist.com/sp/visualized-the-rising-concentration-of-the-sp-500-tema01/
I think it cannot be healthy that all the value is concentrated in so few companies, considering that it is an index of at least 500 companies ...
I consider that the risk is high.
This isn't like the .com bubble, but yeah, it's definitely a bit concerning.
At this point, I just want to own one asset. And if something explodes that helps me get more of that asset at a discount, I'll be happy to watch that bomb explode.
NVIDIA?
No!! Of course I talk about Bitcoin my friend. That is the only asset that matters. free of counterpart risk and without permisonless.
Nah, Bitcoin's not an asset, it's money!
I would say that it fulfills both aspects. It serves as money to make and receive payments, and serves as a risk -free asset to treasure long -term value.
Are the top ten companies in tech?
9/10 ?
As expected lol the growth in tech is what people are paying for