pull down to refresh

...
The dominance of the top 10 stocks has grown steadily over the past few decades. In 1990, they made up about 20% of the index. Today, they’re approaching 40%.
To put this into perspective, even at the height of the dot-com bubble, concentration levels hovered just under 30%. The current figures mark a significant departure from historical norms—and a potential warning sign for investors concerned about concentration risk.
...
90 sats \ 5 replies \ @flat24 18h
I think it cannot be healthy that all the value is concentrated in so few companies, considering that it is an index of at least 500 companies ... I consider that the risk is high.
reply
This isn't like the .com bubble, but yeah, it's definitely a bit concerning.
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @flat24 17h
At this point, I just want to own one asset. And if something explodes that helps me get more of that asset at a discount, I'll be happy to watch that bomb explode.
reply
NVIDIA?
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @flat24 15h
No!! Of course I talk about Bitcoin my friend. That is the only asset that matters. free of counterpart risk and without permisonless.
reply
Nah, Bitcoin's not an asset, it's money!
Are the top ten companies in tech?
reply
9/10 ?
reply
As expected lol the growth in tech is what people are paying for
reply